Brainy guy, better sperm? Take that, tough guy!

Posted on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:45 PM PT

By Brian Alexander

It may seem counterintuitive to those males among us who spent more time in high school reading Dickens or studying calculus than we did making out with Stephanie the cheerleader, but a group of researchers has issued a study finding that higher IQ men have better sperm.

Take that, Mr. Quarterback.

But before the pocket protector set starts strutting in their Radiohead T-shirts, hang on a minute. As interesting and possibly important to a certain subgroup of scientists as the study may be, it says much more about our obsession with grading our masculinity than it does about brains and sperm.

The point of the study was to test a theory about “fitness factor,” explained lead author Rosalind Arden of King’s College, London. Fitness factor, according to the researchers, involves the clues, such as waist-to-hip ratios, that signal we have good genes in general and will produce tip-top babies.

Image: Body Odd

“I chose to analyze the relationship between sperm and intelligence because I thought that if we were serious about the fitness factor idea, then even two [apparently] unrelated traits might be correlated,” she said. In other words, they didn’t set out to prove that smart men have better sperm.

“The bigger idea of the fitness factor,” Arden explained, “is that beauty, health, intelligence, personality - may all exist in a giant web - traced out by the spider of evolutionary fitness.” In other words, one gene or big set of genes that may bestow some fitness traits, like body symmetry, may also confer less obvious ones, like good sperm.

Conveniently for the researchers, in 1985 the U.S. government conducted something called the Vietnam Experience Study, in which war veterans underwent a battery of tests, including intelligence and various physiological measures. Some of the men supplied semen samples. Arden and colleagues examined the data to correlate IQ with semen. It turned out that there was a small link between higher IQ and better semen.

So, smarter guys tend to have higher quality sperm, they found. But the reality is, there is no intellectual push-up a man can do to give himself better— that is, more fit or more aggressive sperm.

If you’re going to be a Go Master,” Arden said, making a pun of a movie about a genius of the Chinese board game, “do it for the love of the stones - not to improve your sperm quality.”

We’d make our sperm happier just by wearing boxers rather than tighty whities and letting those boys breathe.

While the researchers judged quality based on number, density and swimming ability, sperm experts — also known as andrologists — consider other factors to be equally important to fertility, like how the sperm interacts with an egg. The shape, structure and health of the sperm are also important. A normal sperm has a long tail and an oval-shaped head that whips it forward to the egg.

To get healthy sperm, it's recommend that men take a daily multivitamin with selenium, zinc and folic acid, nutrients that are important for sperm function, according to the Mayo Clinic. Guys should also exercise regularly and maintain a healthy weight. Smoking tobacco, pot or drinking too much alcohol can wreak havoc on sperm. Same for stress and steroids.

So, practically speaking, while possibly important to science, the study doesn’t mean much for the average guy. It is, Arden said, “akin to one tiny piece in one of those god-awful humungous jigsaws given by well-meaning aunts as 'improving' Christmas gifts to small boys.”

But the study did reveal a lot about human psychology. To read some of the breathless press coverage, it was a eugenicist’s dream come true. “There are few better ways of upsetting a certain sort of politically correct person than to suggest that intelligence (or, rather, the variation in intelligence between individuals) is under genetic control,” The Economist gleefully noted.

Yet cause-and-effect is not nearly so clear cut. Genes do influence intelligence and a number of studies have linked higher intelligence with better health, according to Douglas Detterman, a professor of psychology at Case Western Reserve University and editor of the journal Intelligence, in which Arden’s paper appeared. For example, higher IQ men have been shown to have less risk of dying of coronary heart disease. Such findings have spawned a new field called “cognitive epidemiology.” But nobody knows why it occurs.

“There is a lot of speculation,” said Detterman. “It could be that people with lower IQs receive inadequate treatment. Perhaps they require more instruction on how to follow doctors’ orders.”

It might also be that people with lower IQs aren’t inherently less fit; they just make less money and cannot afford top quality care. “Disentangling all these factors is complicated,” he said.

So it looks like smart boys are going to have to stick with bait like Shakespeare’s sonnets and Ferraris bought with proceeds from inventing high-tech gadgets to attract the women with whom we’d like to share those sperm. 

Comments

That solves that!  propulsion engineer - 4 kids - 2 while using birth control.
I think there is no doubt that heredity plays an important demise in an idividuals health and sperm
production. Maintaining a healthy life-style and giving your body proper care will increase your odds of having potentially better sperm. I believe that is inevitable!
Absolutely not true, I have three girls age 4 months, 4 years old, and 6 years old. I was brainy as a kid, but due to the environement I did not do as well as my other peers, yet my three children have been lebel as geniuses.  For example my 6 year old taken piano for two months and playing in front of a crowd of approximately 300 people, she did flawlessly. She memorized every key in " Good king wenceslas.My girls are amazing at everything.

Darly Joseph
I like that my appreciation of Radiohead is somehow indicative of my intellect (in the author's opinion anyway).
sounds like a case for eugenics to me
sadly my sperm must be retarded.
is there an inbetween? like somewhat atheletic and smart?
It may be that better blood circulation to the brain is linked with better health overall. In fact, why wouldn't it?
well I guess since my husband and I are both engineers our kids are set!
I'm surprised that no e-mail option exists to allow me to forward either the article content or at least a hyperlink to this story.
Doesn't the MS in MSNBC stand for Microsoft.
What up ???
Oh goodness, no. My ex-husband is brilliant, but he is the poster child for borderline personality disorder. Our son has autism, about as severe as you can get. He's labeled as "nonverbal- behavioral" but he's still more pleasant to be around than his dad. He can type with support, and based on what comes out, we know that he has superior intelligence, too. Also on the "genius" side of the family, my ex father in law has attachment disorder, and the ex sister in law has bipolar, plus two children with ADHD oppositional-defiant and a third child with autism, though he functions pretty well if you don't rock the boat too much. So I'd say the sperm is maybe not so good.
disagree. few things turn on an attractive, educated woman more intensely than intelligence. I've lived it. they're programmed to be attracted to it. of course the prerequisite is great wooing skills, which are independent of both hunkiness and conventional intelligence. (I say conventional because those skills are ultimately a function of intelligence, specifically EQ)

accept it Brian. or are we trying to fill a niche The Economist won't-champion of the average guy.

you know the Jack Welch method of annually purging the worst performing 10% of employees? I say we fry the dumbest 10% of the population every year and replace them with the smartest immigrants we can find from around the world.

oh wait, never mind. that'll make things more competitive for men. oh well. at least it would get us universal health care.
Those who did this research were nerds in High School and College and this is the way they try to get even. Poor nerds, " what is this the revenge of the nerds."
Huh, I have 3 children with a complete idiot! Luckily, he has a very low IQ or I could be the mother of 10
1
It's already established that poverty decreases average IQ thru social and biological means. Eg., poor nourishment before birth and in infancy can reduce permanently reduce a child's IQ.
Anybody who studies IQ should know this.
Is the ignoring of this in the above article due to ignorant researchers or ignorant reporting?
I fail to see why we undertake, much less publish such "research". A person is conceived because sperm and egg unite. One would wonder if similar "research" has been conducted on eggs. Is this the beginning of trying to couple people by intellegence and prevent the creation of others whose intellegence may be less. What if we ended up with a bunch of offspring with superior intellegence but less of other human traits such as compassion for others. I shudder to think what might happen to our world should this happen.
I agree with the article. Genetically speaking, the offspring tends to have grey matter if both the male & female are from good stock & intelligence plays a factor in brain development of the child whose parents have healthy cells. Healthy sperm & female egg can create a highly intelligent human.  
I liked that Radiohead reference (or was it a jab?). http://www.funderoos.com
Maybe geeks get less girls so they had to evolve better sperm to be sure to impregnate the few girls they get.  The dumb jock hunks get to have so much sex that evolutionarily, they could afford to make sperm of lower quality, since quantitatively they get to spread it around more and still increase the chances of passing their genes to the next generation.
Maybe they do, but they don't get a chance to use it.
I'm not trying to relive "Glory Days" here, but I find it odd that you decided to stick it to the quarterback of all people. Having been one myself, as well as having been blessed with above-average intelligence, I would have to speak for all ex-quarterbacks in saying that they are "usually" one of the most intelligent players on the team. Perhaps you would have been better off pointing out the resident high school "badass" that doesn't end up making it to college? Either way, insightful information!
No, if that were true it would be a lot more smarter people around. There is no evidence that there are.
They never get to use it, so it stores and gets strong. Makes sense...poor nerds!
This can't be true. To quote Green Day...only stupid people are breeding... How true is this!
In 4 batteries of tests of my IQ from age 12 to age 42, it has been consistently meaured at between 142 and 150. In the one test of sperm quality at age 38, the doctor reported to my wife that it was "fabulous."

Showing the fragility and shallowness of the male ego, and the scars of having never been particularly athletic as a much too skinny kid in high school, I have much more pride in my sperm count.  Sad, but true.
Way to go, smarty! Finally it's a good thing to be a smart guy. =) Smart guys don't finish last.
I have regularly seen articles and suchlike (no doubt aimed at adolescent males) that "breathlessly" promote the idea that women only like bodybuilders, and implying that unless one follows a strict diet and exercise regime etc. etc., then one is destined to die lonely and dateless or will at least somehow be less-of-a-man. The rational behind the articles is usually partly based on a neo-Darwinian theorizing that confuses 'inclusive fitness' of an individual as part of a species with 'personal fitness' such as one might see in a Gymnasium.

My understanding of current Evolutionary science is that a number of factors feed into 'inclusive fitness', whilst both 'personal fitness' and intelligence are theoretical optimum conditions.

To illustrate the point, we know that we have all evolved into our present condition from our ancestors, and that all currently existing human beings have different levels of personal fitness and different levels intelligence. Further, once one passes a threshold level of personal fitness and intelligence, then any further advances are simply a bonus, rather than a guarantee that your genes are better than someone else's. Certainly, SOME women prefer bodybuilders, and THOSE bodybuilders will have an evolutionary advantage with THOSE women. Just like SOME women prefer intellectuals, and THOSE intellectuals will have an evolutionary advantage with THOSE women.

Now, a person that has trouble catching their breath running for a bus is certainly at a disadvantage to the rest of the population, whilst a person that can't work out how to read the bus timetable is also at a disadvantage to the rest of the population. However, human beings live is a society, where we usually co-operate to help one another out.

Thus, if I'm not personally fit enough to lift heavy objects all day, I can pay someone to do it for me. Likewise, if I'm not intelligent enough to work out how much tax I should be paying, then I can pay someone to do that for me too.

So, I find it ironic that after Exercise fanatics have spent so long boasting that being in peak condition gives them some sort of added advantage over the rest of the population (and thus we should buy their exercise equipment/diet/whatever), that once the intellectuals get to have a brief moment in the spotlight there should be such an uproar.

To sum up, nobody gets any added advantage from spending hours lifting weights or filling out crosswords – unless they enjoy those respective activities in the first instance.
Interesting research and better commentary about how difficult it is to separate out the variables affecting the results.

But really, why be concerned about sperm motility or effectiveness.  Living a life without natural children is perfectly fine.  It's easier socially, financially and domestically.  The time spent raising children can be invested in other interests.  I never understood why couples HAD to have children.  Sex, sure, but why suffer the aftermath.  Oh wait, maybe there are religious reasons to burden yourself with undesired children.  Next step, pro-lifers claiming childless couples are killing future potential children by not conceiving them.
I was a nerd and made out with Stephanie the cheerleader.  I've actually seen my sperm on TV!  Great motility, nice tails.  My two kids are bright, artistic and brilliant.  They are adopted from Russia.  Who cares about your stupid sperm?
there's sure alot of beating around the bush on this topic. Dumb is dumb, and skewing the IQ scale to make those lacking feel better is beyond being PC; a sad result of the "no kid left behind" unsuccessful application
I hate that people are insinuating that people with higher IQs are worse looking than people with lower IQs. My husband has an IQ of 146 and is good looking. All this article is saying is that smarter men produce better quality sperm, not smarter children.
If smart guys have better sperm, then why is the world declining ever more quickly into stupidity?
From "someone in New England", seems your ex husband and his family are ridden with diseases all over and it was passed down to your child. My ex had the same thing, and so did his sister(bipolar) and brother(not sure), and well, it didn't work out. I would avoid having children with someone who's family has such a history, as I don't want my children to have such problems. I know it sounds crude, but, I want the best possible option for my children to live on their own and not depend on others to hold their hand all their life.

As for this article, it matters not to me if the man is purely atheletic or purely brainy. If he can hold his own conversation and impress me based on personality and what he's got, then i'm all for it.
ET DOSN'T HAVE NADDS?
Curious...Intelligent people I know (self included) who can't conceive, adopt lovely children from birth parents who could be considered as challenged.  
I might have to give up on this column. There's not much being hypothesized, and even less to back it up. Why do I keep falling for the catchy titles? I should know better by now. I do like brainy men, though. I suppose they're probably kind of stingy with their procreativity, and for lots of very smart reasons, but how nice that they exist. I only wish there were more of them.
Everything that we and our mates are goes into our children. If alcohol, cigarettes, and other drugs go into the making of our children, how much more does our intelligence, and good qualities go into our children. There is a lecture and a huge subject everyone should study "How To Give Birth To A God"
Everyone here assumes that smart people aren't also athletic.  I played sports all my life and also scored at the top of my class.  I also have 6 kids all at the top of their classes and also athletic.  Lets not associate athletic with dumb and smart with nerd.  
Its very simple Dave, there are precious few of us "smart guys" and billions of you not so smart guys thinking with the smaller brain between your legs.  In addition, very smart fathers like myself often delay having children until much later in life.

<< If smart guys have better sperm, then why is the world declining ever more quickly into stupidity?
Dave, Austin, TX (Wednesday, December 17, 2008 6:11 PM)>>
Well the brain is, in fact, in charge. So why wouldn't a healthier brain mean a healthier body overall? It's simple common sense. Also it seems to me that healthier sperm in smart guys may be an adaptation to make up for the fact that the dumb guys get more chicks. In other words it ensures that the smart guys can keep up since the dumb guys have more times at bat.
Well now we know which ones are constantly removing their sperm to be able to state these facts! what do you call it??? chronic __--???
well i cannot remember!
Hey Jennifer - "only stupid people are breeding" is from Harvey Danger, not Green Day. I wonder if Green Day had any lyrics for people posting?

Sorry to be snarky - but your post was not exactly nice to the parents out there.
Before taking sides and pitting genius versus jock, we should all be pretty much be aware of the social pyramid. More less intelligent people are having children because more quantity is required to fill the bulk of the less complex stations in society. Intelligent people generally make up the upper portions of the pyramid that require less people, it's all proportionate to the requirements of said society. We research men because that is our prime focus reproductively, getting the most opportunities to reproduce. This research is almost irrelevant, intelligent women are attracted to intelligent men, less intelligent women are attracted to less intelligent men whose physical stature equates to physical endurance in a physical work environment or in terms of pre-historic requirements, the ability to hunt, gather and protect. The more intelligent led the tribes and made tools but less were needed of those.

The same goes for this day and age, the thing that should be researched is a better way to bring these people together. Mediocre humans always have no problem finding other mediocre humans to mate with.
I HAVE BEEN TEST 5 TIMES NOW IQ 146 NOT THE GREATEST LOOKING NOT IN BEST SHAPE.  I HAVE GREAT SPERM.  FIRST TIME TRING TO GET MY WIFE KNOCKED UP  GOT HER PREG HAVE A VERY SMART 5 YR OLD ABOVE AVERAGE IQ.  
I agree with others who opine that athleticism doesn't necessarily equal lack of intelligence and vice-versa.  Throughtout my school years I was always the best at every sport I participated in, always scored between 147 & 158 on IQ tests, was constantly at the top of the class (AS classes no less) in terms of grades and have done great with the ladies.  I think it's just a matter of good genes that gives one the confidence to be the best at what they do. I just hope my career in nuclear engineering doesn't affect the goods.
READ!!!--- SMART ONES... BRAINY GUY = GOOD SPERM NOT NECESSARILY BRAINY SPERM, DUH! GOOD SPERM = ONE THAT CAN SWIM FAST AND FERTILIZE THE EGG FIRST OR RIGHT AWAY!  I wondered where your brains were...on vacation,maybe (as one of my students pointed out to another who was utterly off-tangent!)guys, this study does NOT  generalized that athletic people are dumb, or that quarterbacks don't know anything, or whatever! of course there are guys gifted with/ or without both. Think!... or do you even? anyway, if you really are interested in having children with good genes, have your selected mate undergo the genetics tests, or better yet, go IVF and choose the perfect one...if there ever will be one! I'm just happy to be me...thanks to my parents...intelligent or otherwise..
this slight correlation doesn't do it for me. I have above average IQ and without vain consider myself on the high end of the attractive scale --what I want to know is where I can get MY sperm checked out. I have high standards for how I'd like my future offspring to turn out and if my sperm happens to be lethargic or something I'll just go ahead and dash my hope of ever having children now.

...and Mensa Smart Guy should start thinking with his balls more. I think sex decreases pretentious, self-serving-comment postings, but I'm not a Doctor. Not quite smart enough.
Reminds me of the "Men at work" sign. When men work, they have to put up a sign. I have three boys (twins) and I don't need a study about my eggs to know that something wonderful happened and I will love my boys no matter what their IQ or sperm quality. Life is about people, all different kinds and we don't need studies to tell us how good or how bad we are.
Hmmm, my husband is a genius but his sperm is low quality...and low count!
Smart guys... er, don't forget part of that attraction is your earning potential. Sure, you may not be as good looking, but many women won't be looking at you as much as what you can provide.

Seems like the earlier mention of military men/IQs seems to lend itself to a population with better physical health as well. I wonder if data was generated for a more 'average' population of men, without the corresponding requirement of a 'job' that likely req's a higher level of physical fitness than the average joe.


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Insights and ruminations on the strangeness of all things medical, pharmaceutical and biological.

Msnbc.com writers and editors will muse upon the wonderfully weird human body and the medical curiosities that make you go huh, ewww or ouch! Looking for informed, unhinged meditations on everything from dubious diseases to recipes for ersatz mucous? Well, this is the place.

If you have a question, e-mail The Body Odd.

Archives


Add this blog to your news reader